![]() When it comes to climbing it's rider weight distribution that matters most. It's not stated what the two bikes being compared here are so apart from head angle they're an unknown. Other factors apart from seat tube angle (wheelbase etc) can have an influence on how well a bike climbs in certain situations. The rider's choice of positioning when sitting on the saddle affects weight distribution also (eg: sitting out on the nose or sitting further back on the saddle). On top of this effective seat tube angle is affected by the choice of seatpost head offset and on full suspension bikes the amount of suspension sag (more suspension sag gives a slacker effective seat tube angle when riding). Sliding the saddle fully forwards or back on the rails is around a 2 degree change in seat tube angle by itself. Although a geometry chart may show a newer bike having a steeper seat tube angle than an older bike there is quite a bit of adjustment of effective seat angle available. Outwardly identical bikes with the same frame can potentially be set up very differently. The Evo has me PR'ing everything, and in some cases it's a good match for my Diverge up fire roads etc.Ĭlick to expand.When it comes to climbing it's rider weight distribution that matters most. I do expect people coming from lightweight hardtails with steep HTAs to "feel" that the bike is not as efficient, because it's not as nervous, and over the front wheel. There is a need to work on the shock tune to find the sweet spot, esp rebound damping. Might be helped by how the new SIDs perform as well. If I hit a rooty section, this would bog the old bikes down, loss of speed and flow, since I always had to work to unweight the front by moving my butt backwards. The new geo also brings more speed - it keeps momentum more easily in rough terrain, both up and on the flat/rolling trails. Much unlike my '19 Stumpjumper LT which I liked much better in high for everything except enduros. ![]() When I saw the geo numbers, especially the HTA, I expected to flip the Evo to high mode for xc-style trails, but have not felt the slightest need to. I'm very happy how the new Evo will climb silly steeps without the need for wrapping your limbs around the bars. This helps the bike handle better at slower speeds and on technical terrain, and. This would often mean that I had to get out of the saddle to keep it down, and would spin out from loss of traction. A slacker head tube angle lengthens the wheelbase and pushes the front wheel out further from the bottom bracket. When it comes to racey handling, expect a fork trail of 55 to 59mm and a steep head angle of72.5-73º. I'm on XL's, and on the '18 I would have issues with front wheel lift when it got steep and technical. I'll also chip in that I find my '21 Evo to climb better than my '18 Epic in both std as well as Evo'd guide, and also better than my '16 Epic.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |